Categories:
See Also:

Corvette Forum Archive (38 950 posts)






LeftLetterRight





German versionFrench version

Subject:
Re: I dont get the c3 vs c4 values

From: "Dad" <knockers(at)fish.net>

Subject: Re: I dont get the c3 vs c4 values

Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:00:08 -0500

Lines: 35

NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.201.40.70

________________________________________________











"Mike Ellison" <mikeellison3(at)yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:41A14583.1020403(at)yahoo.com...

> Bob has the advantage of everyday comparisons that a fine stable of iron

> provides but he is searching for the descriptor I call, "raw automobile."

>

> There will always be a market for good-looking raw automobiles--we call

> these "classics." They are great on the street and on sweeping back

> roads. Gov. Arnold has signed the bill that lifts smog regs from early &

> mid C3s and that will give these cars a further $$ boost.

>

> I don`t view the C3 (or C4) as a proper weapon for our tight mountain

> roads--the C5 (and most likely the C6) is the better "driving instrument"

> for that job.

>

> C4s do a lot of jobs much better than C3s but in each of those qualities

> they are overshadowed by the C5 -- Dad might say, "eclipsed." This factor

> will probably keep C4 prices depressed and most C4s will follow a faster

> path to salvage than will C3s. Left will be a few collector`s C4s. With

> some low mileage C5s approching $20K I`m getting very "tempted."

>

> Mike

> `89 Coupe owner, occasional C5 rentor

>

I`d never say "eclipsed", my `72 has an entirely different reason to drive

it, the C5 and now the C6 is a traveling car that you can race when you want

to. I do agree, the C4 was just an OK Corvette, if you like the style and

can stand the shake, they`re great. On the other hand I tolerate the 72`s

awkwardness because I like to drive it, and love it`s looks.

--

Dad

05 C6 Silver/Red 6spd Z51

72 Shark Black/Black/4spd








Next Topic
From: RicSeyler <ricseyler(at)SPAMgulf.net>

Subject: Re: I dont get the c3 vs c4 values

boundary="------------020902050508040703020404"

Lines: 69

Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:05:32 -0600

________________________________________________









This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--------------020902050508040703020404



LOLOLOLOL



Dad wrote:



>

>>

>>

>Hard to take isn`t it dave, something being "blown" without you being

>involved.

>

>



--

Ric Seyler

Online Racing: RicSeyler

GPL Handicap 6.35

ricseyler(at)SPAMgulf.net

http://www.pcola.gulf.net/~ricseyler

remove -SPAM- from email address

--------------------------------------

"Homer no function beer well without."

- H.J. Simpson





--------------020902050508040703020404



<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">

<html>

<head>

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">

<title></title>

</head>

<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">

LOLOLOLOL<br>

<br>

Dad wrote:<br>

<blockquote type="cite" cite="midoNedndOYS5QBtDzcRVn-pA(at)bright.net"><br>

<blockquote type="cite">

<pre wrap="">

</pre>

</blockquote>

<pre wrap=""><!---->Hard to take isn`t it dave, something being "blown" without you being

involved.

</pre>

</blockquote>

<br>

<pre class="moz-signature" cols="85">--

Ric Seyler

Online Racing: RicSeyler

GPL Handicap 6.35

<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ricseyler(at)SPAMgulf.net">ricseyler(at)SPAMgulf.net</a>

<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.pcola.gulf.net/~ricseyler">http://www.pcola.gulf.net/~ricseyler</a>

remove –SPAM- from email address

--------------------------------------

"Homer no function beer well without."

- H.J. Simpson

</pre>

</body>

</html>



--------------020902050508040703020404--








Next Topic
From: Barking Rats <please_no_emails(at)myaddy.com>

Subject: Re: I dont get the c3 vs c4 values

Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:59:38 -0800

Lines: 30

________________________________________________









In article <vsqdne5lD9Gy1TzcRVn-oQ(at)bright.net>,

"Dad" <knockers(at)fish.net> wrote:



> I`d never say "eclipsed", my `72 has an entirely different reason to drive

> it, the C5 and now the C6 is a traveling car that you can race when you want

> to. I do agree, the C4 was just an OK Corvette, if you like the style and

> can stand the shake, they`re great. On the other hand I tolerate the 72`s

> awkwardness because I like to drive it, and love it`s looks.



Right. The older cars offer a driving experience that is

seat-of-the-pants. Compared to today`s cars, not that comfortable and

not that refined. But, driving these cars offers a heightened sense of

operating a powerful machine. One can feel the road and feel the brute

force of acceleration. New Corvettes may be faster and more nimble, but

the sensations have been dulled by refinements - I think the older

Corvettes offer more of your senses to be engaged in the experience.



After an hour or two of tooling around in my `67, I find myself tired

but satisfied. The car can really beat you up in some ways but it`s an

experience I relish.

Here`s waving to ya - ||||



Owen

___



`67BB & `72BB

___



"To know the world intimately is the beginning of caring."

-- Ann Hayman Zwinger








Last "Cars" Post on Wordpress:


Title: words can't describe this picture
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:31:23 +0000
Author: supermade

bmw

seen on speedhunters


More on: http://supermade.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/words-cant-describe-this-picture/



____________________________________________

Title: I am not a fan of BMW month
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:40:06 +0000
Author: whoisfelix

I pretty much visit the Speedhunters website daily for my car fix. I actually need quite a few of those thoughout any given day. Every month lately, they’ve been sticking to a theme. I was fully on board for speed month, as they covered salt flat racing, wangan cars, and did some pretty awesome retrospective coverage of the old Avus and Autobahn circuits. This month, they are doing BMW month. I don’t hate BMW’s. In fact, I like them quite a lot. BMW’s don’t vary that much and I feel like I’ve seen it all. I guess I’m just waiting for the October theme to be announced so I can get back on board. Not hating, just waiting…

Here’s a couple of shots that I actually REALLY liked from last month. Some just look cool, others show another side of speed. I had no idea that Top Secret built a pikes peak car. I am late to the Pentroof party. At any rate, here are my favorites for Speed Month in August on Speedhunters;

smokeypikespeak

Ludvigsen

ford tr 20090730 9526

lambosatpa

lsr 01


More on: http://whoisfelix.com/2009/09/24/i-am-not-a-fan-of-bmw-month/